The landlord never provided a Landlord's Certificate — what happens?

The landlord has not provided a Landlord's Certificate

Silence counts against the landlord. Where a Leaseholder Deed of Certificate has been properly served and no Landlord's Certificate comes back inside the statutory period, the landlord is treated as having met the contribution condition — which means they cannot pass the cost of the identified historic defects to leaseholders through the service charge. The protection arrives by default rather than by agreement, and that distinction has consequences later.

From the e-ROT archive

This scenario is drawn from Report on Title material dealing with this specific circumstance.

Lexsure master Report on Title paragraph: Building Safety Act - No response from Landlord · See the wording

How the certificates are supposed to work

The regime runs on two documents. The leaseholder serves a Deed of Certificate establishing that the lease qualifies. The landlord responds with a Landlord's Certificate setting out whether remediation is due on the building and whether they meet the contribution condition — broadly, whether their group is wealthy enough to be required to pay.

The landlord has a defined period to respond, and the regulations attach a consequence to missing it rather than leaving the leaseholder to chase.

What default protection actually gives you

It bars recovery of the cost of the historic defects already identified. The landlord is treated as meeting the contribution condition, and those costs cannot come through the service charge.

It does not freeze the position for ever. If new relevant defects are identified later, the landlord can serve a certificate in respect of those, provided it is done within the required timescales. The protection is specific to what was on the table when the clock ran out.

Why it can still be awkward when you sell

Because it rests on an absence. A buyer's solicitor reading the file sees a protection that exists because a document was never produced, rather than a protection evidenced by a document that was.

Some lenders and some buyers are cautious about that, and the practical results are more enquiries, more delay, and a smaller pool of people willing to proceed. The Lexsure wording below is unusually frank about this.

The answer is documentary and it is worth being obsessive about it: keep the Deed of Certificate, proof of service, the date the response period expired, and every piece of correspondence. On a future sale that file is the protection. Make sure it comes to you on completion and does not stay with the seller's solicitor.

Building Safety Act - No response from Landlord

Master precedent Lexsure e-ROTScope Protection by defaultWord count 91Status Current master paragraph

A Leaseholder Certificate has been validly completed and served pursuant to the Building Safety Act 2022. The landlord has not provided a Landlord’s Certificate within the statutory four-week timeframe.

In accordance with the Building Safety (Leaseholder Protections) (England) Regulations 2022 , the absence of a Landlord’s Certificate means that the leaseholder qualifies for statutory protection by default in respect of historic building safety defects already identified. The landlord is treated as meeting the contribution condition and is therefore prevented from recovering remediation costs relating to those defects through the service charge. …

Dealing with this on a current conveyancing matter?

Current Report on Title paragraph

Do not rely on wording copied or saved from this page. Get the current wording dealing with this scenario.

View current paragraph →

ROT Notification Service

Keep relevant ROT wording under review as Lexsure issues updates.

View Notification Service →

e-ROT Generator

Use Lexsure’s full Report on Title system.

Explore e-ROT Generator →